Tip: Choose Save as PDF in the print dialog to download. Use A4 paper size.
Shade in the A or B circle for each question.
Draw a line connecting each item on the left to its match on the right.
| Left column | Right column | |
|---|---|---|
| 1Affordance review: Does the button look clickable? | AChecklist: affordance, interoperability, security, usability | |
| 2Interoperability review: Can it export to CSV? | BRequire a 16-character password plus a code at every login | |
| 3Trade-off: stronger security can make a system harder to use | CChecks that the solution can exchange data with other software or systems, so an export option is added to the design | |
| 4Reviewing a design against UX characteristics means checking each one in turn | DChecks that controls show users how they can be used, so a design is changed if a button looks like plain text | |
| 5Design decision: remove all passwords because logging in is annoying, so usability is perfect | EUsability is improved by sacrificing security completely, ignoring the trade-off between the two characteristics | |
| 6Review: the app is easy to use, so the UX review is finished | FOnly usability was checked, but affordance, interoperability and security must also be reviewed |
Complete each line of code by filling in the missing parts.
Shade in the letter of the line that contains an error.
UX characteristics — Affordance, interoperability, security and usability. Designers review a solution against each one and balance trade-offs, such as stronger security making a system harder to use.Button looks clickable: affordanceWorks with other systems: interoperabilityEasy one-tap login may weaken securitySecurity vs usability is a trade-offIF loginSteps > 3 THEN review usability