Wired vs wireless: reliability

Tip: Choose Save as PDF in the print dialog to download. Use A4 paper size.

Wired vs wireless: reliability

Name:
Date:
Class:

Quick Questions

Shade in the A or B circle for each question.

1. Which type of connection is usually more reliable?
A Wired, because it is less affected by interference
B Wireless, because signals never drop out
2. A student's video call freezes when someone uses the microwave nearby. What is the most likely cause?
A The cable has run out of data
B Interference with the wireless signal
3. Which statement about dropped connections is true?
A Wireless signals can drop out more often than wired ones
B Wired connections drop out more often than wireless ones
4. Which is a reliability risk for a wired connection?
A A damaged or cut cable
B A neighbour's phone nearby
5. Why can a thick wall cause a wireless connection to drop out?
A It makes the wireless signal travel faster
B It can block or weaken the wireless signal

Match the Pairs

Draw a line connecting each item on the left to its match on the right.

Left columnRight column
1reliability AWireless is usually less reliable, not more. Having no cable does not make it steadier. Its signal travels through the air, so walls, other devices and distance can cause interference and dropouts.
2dropped connection BWired networks can still fail. A cable that is bent, cut, crushed or unplugged can break the connection, so cable damage is a wired risk. They are just usually more reliable.
3Wired connections are usually more reliable because interference affects them less Cif interference == true: wireless = "drops out"
4Wireless signals can drop out when interference gets in the way Dwired.reliability = "high"
5Wireless is always more reliable than wired because it has no cables. EA wireless link that suddenly cuts out, often because of weak signal or interference
6A wired network can never lose connection. FHow steadily a connection stays working without dropping out or slowing down

Definitions

reliability

Fill in the Blanks

Complete each line of code by filling in the missing parts.

1.
IF interference = "high" ____ connection ← "dropped" END IF
2.
IF cable = "damaged" THEN connection _ "lost" END IF
3.
IF signal _ 20 THEN status ← "dropped" END IF
4.
IF type = "wireless" THEN risk ← "interference" ____ risk ← "cable damage"
5.
IF signal = "lost" __ cable = "cut" THEN alert ← "no connection" END IF

Spot the Error

Shade in the letter of the line that contains an error.

Question 1
A connection ← "wired"
B IF connection = "wired" THEN
C interference ← "low"
D reliability ← "low"
E ENDIF
Question 2
A connection ← "wireless"
B IF connection = "wireless" THEN
C risk ← "cable can break"
D ENDIF
Question 3
A connection ← "wired"
B cableDamaged ← true
C IF NOT cableDamaged THEN
D status ← "disconnected"
E ENDIF
Question 4
A interference ← 8
B IF interference < 5 THEN
C wifi ← "may drop out"
D ENDIF
Question 5
A mostReliable ← "wireless"
B reason ← "less interference"
C OUTPUT mostReliable, reason

Answer Key

Wired vs wireless: reliability
Section A: Quick Questions
Q1
A — Wired, because it is less affected by interference
Q2
B — Interference with the wireless signal
Q3
A — Wireless signals can drop out more often than wired ones
Q4
A — A damaged or cut cable
Q5
B — It can block or weaken the wireless signal
Section B: Match the Pairs
Q1
reliability → How steadily a connection stays working without dropping out or slowing down
Q2
dropped connection → A wireless link that suddenly cuts out, often because of weak signal or interference
Q3
Wired connections are usually more reliable because interference affects them less → wired.reliability = "high"
Q4
Wireless signals can drop out when interference gets in the way → if interference == true: wireless = "drops out"
Q5
Wireless is always more reliable than wired because it has no cables. → Wireless is usually less reliable, not more. Having no cable does not make it steadier. Its signal travels through the air, so walls, other devices and distance can cause interference and dropouts.
Q6
A wired network can never lose connection. → Wired networks can still fail. A cable that is bent, cut, crushed or unplugged can break the connection, so cable damage is a wired risk. They are just usually more reliable.
Section C: Definitions
Q1
reliability — How steadily a connection stays working. Wired is usually more reliable as interference affects it less, while wireless signals can drop out.
Section D: Fill in the Blanks
Q1
IF interference = "high" THEN connection ← "dropped" END IF
Q2
IF cable = "damaged" THEN connection ← "lost" END IF
Q3
IF signal < 20 THEN status ← "dropped" END IF
Q4
IF type = "wireless" THEN risk ← "interference" ELSE risk ← "cable damage"
Q5
IF signal = "lost" OR cable = "cut" THEN alert ← "no connection" END IF
Section E: Spot the Error
Q1
D — Wired connections are less affected by interference, so they are usually more reliable. The line should set reliability to "high".
Q2
C — A wireless connection has no cable, so the main risk is that the signal can drop out. The line should be risk ← "signal can drop out".
Q3
C — Damage to a cable is a risk for wired networks. The connection is lost when the cable IS damaged, so the condition should be IF cableDamaged THEN.
Q4
B — Wi-Fi drops out when interference is high. With a value of 8, the test should be interference > 5, not < 5.
Q5
A — Wired connections are usually more reliable because interference affects them less. Wireless signals are the ones that can drop out, so the value should be "wired".